V1.4 SP12.0

1. Contracting Agency is DoD 2. Country of Product or Service Origin is one of the qualifying countries as mentioned above 3. PSC Codes allowed are 1000-9999, with an exception of 5510, 87**, 88**, 9410, 9430, 9440, 9610, 9620 or 9630

However, the following discrepancies have been noticed:

1. Currently, the “Buy American Act Place of Manufacture” report does not consider the following in the calculation of data for the column “Mfg Outside the U.S. - Qualifying Country (DoD Funds Only)”: a. the value of “Country of Product or Service Origin” b. DoD as the Contracting Agency

Hence, for this column, “Country of Product or Service Origin’ could be any country and the contract could be civilian, as long as the value for “Place of Manufacture” is ‘L’ (Mfg Outside the U.S. - Qualifying Country (DoD Only)).

2. Additionally, FPDS-NG does not have validation rules to restrict selection of only those qualifying countries as “Country of Product or Service Origin” when “Place of Manufacture” is ‘Mfg Outside the U.S. - Qualifying Country (DoD Only)’.

3. Also, al though the value reads as ‘Mfg Outside the U.S. - Qualifying Country (DoD Only), there is no validation rule in FPDS-NG to restrict civilian users from selecting this value.

4. Finally, the validation rule 9H04 (Place of Manufacture can not be 'Mfg in U.S.', 'Mfg outside U.S. - Use outside the U.S.', 'Mfg outside U.S. - Resale', 'Mfg outside U.S. - Trade Agreements', 'Mfg outside U.S. - Commercial information technology', 'Mfg outside U.S - Public interest Determination', 'Mfg outside U.S. - Domestic non-availability', 'Mfg outside U.S. - Unreasonable cost' or 'Mfg outside U.S. - Qualifying country (DOD only)' when the 'PSC Code' is not '1000-9999', with an exception of the values: 5510, 87**, 88**, 9410, 9430, 9440, 9610, 9620 or 9630.) that ensures selection of only certain values for the PSC Code was implemented in mid 2008. So there are documents that have one of these values for “Place of Manufacture” and with an invalid PSC Code, bases signed prior to this rule or modifications against the bases that did not have this rule applied.

The “Buy American Act Place of Manufacture” report shall be fixed such that the column, ‘Mfg Outside the U.S. - Qualifying Country (DoD Funds Only)’ shall consider only the following documents:

Contracting Agency ID belongs to DoD AND "Place of Manufacture" = ‘L’ AND "PSC Code" between 1000 and 9999 (both values inclusive, but excluding 5510, 87**, 88**, 9410, 9430, 9440, 9610, 9620 or 9630) AND "Country of Product or Service Origin" is one of the following qualifying countries: o Australia o Austria o Belgium o Canada o Denmark o Egypt o Federal Republic of Germany o Finland o France o Greece o Israel o Italy o Luxembourg o Netherlands o Norway o Portugal o Spain o Sweden o Switzerland o Turkey o United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

As per the subject Change Request (CR), any DoD document that is funded by civilian agencies could be accessed by any user just like a civilian document could be accessed.

Note: These documents will have a non-DoD Funding Agency and Funding Office.

2. Civilian agencies shall be able to award Orders (Delivery/Task Orders and BPA Calls) against the above documents that are IDVs.

3. The above documents shall be transferred to the civilian agencies, if need be.

4. Correction to the Funding Agency and the Funding Office as DoD values on the above documents shall qualify them to be categorized under the ‘Date Signed + 90 day’ condition.

5. “Reveal Date” condition shall continue to apply for the new DoD final documents that are funded by DoD. Such documents shall continue to be non-accessible by the civilian agencies and the public users, as soon as the documents are reported to FPDS-NG. Note: These documents will have a DoD Funding Agency and Funding Office.

6. New DoD draft documents, irrespective of who funded them, shall not be accessed by the civilian agencies and the public users.

7. Existing DoD final documents that are funded by civilian agencies shall be accessed by the civilian agencies and the public users. Note: These documents will have a non-DoD Funding Agency and Funding Office. Note: Existing Final Awards that currently have Reveal Date marked are 545. Existing Final IDVs that currently have Reveal Date marked are 14.

8. Civilian agencies shall be able to award Orders (Delivery/Task Orders and BPA Calls) against the above documents that are IDVs.

9. The above documents shall be transferred to the civilian agencies, if need be.

10. Correction to the Funding Agency and the Funding Office as DoD values on the above documents shall again qualify them to be categorized under the ‘Date Signed + 90 day’ condition.

11. “Reveal Date” condition shall continue to apply for the existing DoD final documents that are funded by DoD. Such documents shall continue to be non-accessible by the civilian agencies and the public users, as soon as the documents are reported to FPDS-NG. Note: These documents will have a DoD Funding Agency and Funding Office.

12. Existing DoD draft documents, irrespective of who funded them, shall not be accessed by the civilian agencies and the public users.

13. Standard Reports and Adhoc Reports, when executed by civilian agencies or the public users, shall retrieve the DoD (final) documents that are funded by civilian agencies.

14. BI Views, when executed by civilian agencies shall retrieve the DoD (final) documents that are funded by civilian agencies.

15. ezSearch, when searched by civilian agencies or the public users, shall retrieve the DoD (final) documents that are funded by civilian agencies.

16. ICD, when searched by civilian agencies or the public users shall retrieve the DoD (final) documents that are funded by civilian agencies.

17. Public Atom Feed shall retrieve the DoD (final) documents that are funded by civilian agencies.

18. Detail Atom Feed shall retrieve the DoD (final) documents that are funded by civilian agencies.

19. DoD Atom Feed shall continue to behave as is.

2. “Rerepresentation Eligible Actions Report” shall remove Modification Number from the drill down path and thus the report cannot be drilled down to Modification Number.

3. “Rerepresentation Eligible Actions Report” shall remove Modification Number column from the Award Detail.

4. The preview shall be updated to remove the “Modification Number” from the Award Detail.

1. It shall consider “Contracting Office ID” that is selected as one of the search criteria filters.

2. It shall exclude NASA Specific Awards (Grant for Research, Training Grant, Cooperative Agreement, Intragovernmental and Funded Space Act Agreement).

Currently, “Performance Based Acquisition” report considers contracts only when the Action Obligation or Ultimate Contract Value on each of the contracts (in the family) is greater than $25,000. In other words, the contracts whose current Action Obligation or Ultimate Contract Value is greater than $25,000 are considered in the report.

Note: Current exclusions continue to apply.

2. The Award Detail for “Performance Based Acquisition” report shall observe the following logic in determining the document (in the contractual family) to be displayed: 1. If the report is executed for the Date range that matches with the “Date Signed” on the base document, then base document shall be displayed. 2. If the report is executed for the Date range that matches with the “Date Signed’ on a particular modification document, then the respective modification shall be displayed. 3. If the report is executed for the Date range that matches with the “Date Signed” on more than one modification, then latest modification shall be displayed 4. If the report is executed for the Date range that matches with the “Date Signed” of the entire contractual family, then the latest modification shall be displayed. Latest Modification: Document with the latest “Date Signed” if the “Date Signed” is unique or document with the latest “Prepared Date” if two documents have the same “Date Signed”. Note: If the cumulative numbers qualify a contractual family to be eligible to be displayed in the “Performance Based Acquisition” report, it is redundant to display the whole family of base and the modifications.

3. Appendix changes shall be done accordingly.

8P01- If "Funding Agency" is not DoD, then "Consolidated Contract" must be "No".

i. Extent Competed = A ii. Solicitation Procedures = MAFO iii. Type of Set Aside = NONE iv. Evaluated Preference = NONE v. Number of Offers = 2

For Local Area Set Aside: 1. When an existing V 1.2 document (signed on 07/30/2008) is corrected using the V 1.4 service, the validation rule, 10C20 (If "Other than Full and Open Competition" is 'Authorized by Statute' or 'SAP Non-Competition', then "Local Area Set Aside" must be 'No'.) displayed correctly. However when LASA is set to ‘No’ or ‘N’, the value is not saved.

For Commercial Item Procedures (CIAP): 1. V 1.2 documents that have “Commercial Item Test Program”(CITP) = Yes (Y) when corrected using the V 1.4 service with the values of CIAP as A, B, C or D display the following error message:

<ns1:errorCode>10J01V12</ns1:errorCode> <ns1:errorMessage>If the "Commercial Item Test Program" is "Yes" then "Commercial Item Acquisition Procedures must be "Yes".</ns1:errorMessage>

2. V 1.4 ‘Create’ with CIAP as ‘N’ or any invalid value displays a System Error.

2. BSDF is returned for the data element “Commercial Item Test Program” through Version 1.4 ‘get’ Service. 3. BSDF is returned for the data element “Local Area Set Aside” through Atom Feeds.

2. Remove ‘BSDF’ value from FPDS-NG for all the data elements.

3. Re-configure the following Validation Rule to be displayed on Version 1.2 contracts even if they were never touched through GUI services.

2. During the creation of the Reporting Views, the Congressional District and States are derived based on the Zip Codes. In the above scenario, the contract has a foreign PoP Country Code but with valid US Zip Codes, States and Congressional Districts.

Thus the solutions for the above issues are:

1. FPDS-NG shall accept only 3-digit country ISO codes from GUI Services and Web Portal but continue to accept 2-digit FIPS Code from Business Services.

2. The Reporting View creation shall be fixed to derive US Specific information (Congressional District, State Code etc) from the Zip-Code only when the Country Code is US.

Acquisitions by agencies on behalf of foreign governments or entities or international organizations: Awards in which the contract for foreign entity is yes are excluded from the report.

FPDSHD-74763: Several Funding Office codes are displayed without the respective names in the “Small Business Goaling Report” and the “Small Business Achievements by Awarding Organization Report”. Some of them are: GE500, AJ200, CO200, PM070, SU400, DR860, CO150, BB210, GV100, GA100, MO550, HK300, BL400, TO400, MX115, MX530, JO100, TZ200, GY200, JA800, VE300, CA770, UV700, IZ100, KE500, AL600, PK330 and TS800.

FPDSPMOS-86: DoD Tricare (Contracting) Office code H94002 has an end date of April 30, 2010; it exists as a funding office and is excluded in the “Small Business Goaling Report” and the “Small Business Achievements by Awarding Organization Report”. Contracting Office code HT9402 has a start date of May 1, 2010 and it should be excluded from these two reports.

Acquisitions by agencies on behalf of foreign governments or entities or international organizations: Documents that are funded by foreign entities (“Funded by Foreign Entity” = ‘Yes’ OR “Foreign Funding” = ‘Foreign Funds – FMS’ or ‘Foreign Funds – non-FMS’) are excluded from the report.

2. “Small Business Goaling Report” and the “Small Business Achievements by Awarding Organization Report” shall display the names of the Funding Offices.

3. “Small Business Goaling Report” and the “Small Business Achievements by Awarding Organization Report” shall exclude documents that are awarded by HT9402 (TRICARE MGMT ACTIVITY AURORA WEST)

2. “Commercial Item Acquisition Procedures” shall continue to propagate from the referenced IDV on the V 1.4 DOs and BPA Calls.