Difference between revisions of "Data Management SP6.1"

From FPDS-NG

 
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
<TABLE id="box-table-a" border=2 style="width: 800px">
 
<TABLE id="box-table-a" border=2 style="width: 800px">
<th width=15% align="center"><b>SPR #</b></th><th width=35% align="center"><b>Problem</b></th><th width=35% align="center"><b>Solution</b></th><th width=34% align="center"><b>Awards/IDVs Fixed</b></th>
+
<th width=15% align="center"><b>SPR</b></th><th width=70% align="center"><b>Description</b></th><th width=15% align="center"><b>Awards/IDVs Fixed</b></th>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td style="width:95px" valign="center">FPDSHD-72449</td>
 
<td style="width:95px" valign="center">FPDSHD-72449</td>
 
<td>  
 
<td>  
Removed LASA value on all Awards and IDVs whose date signed is prior to 04-AUG-2006</td>
+
Removed Local Area Set Aside value on all Awards and IDVs where date signed is prior to 04-AUG-2006</td>
 
<td align="center">43,749</td>
 
<td align="center">43,749</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td style="width:95px" valign="center">FPDSHD-72791</td>
+
<td style="width:95px" valign="center">FPDSHD-72449</td>
<td valign="top">
+
<td>
The user requested to fix invalid “extent competed” value ‘CDO/NDO’  on Post CLOD Delivery Orders referencing multiple IDV
+
Removed Local Area Set Aside value on all 1.3, 1.4 final Awards or IDVs, 1.2 final Awards or IDVs that are updated via GUI services or Web Portal and whose Local Area Set Aside value is ‘BSDF’.</td>
 +
<td align="center">188,707</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td style="width:95px" valign="center">Competition Report</td>
 +
<td>  
 +
Updated Reason Not competed to 'Authorized by Statute' on all Awards and IDVs whose extent competed is ‘Not Available for Competition’ and Reason Not competed is ‘8AN’.
 
</td>
 
</td>
<td>
+
<td align="center">43,128</td>
Data fix was completed to fix all Post CLOD Delivery Orders referencing multiple IDVs to not have CDO/NDO and to pull the extent competed value from the IDV
+
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td style="width:95px" valign="center">Competition Report</td>
 +
<td>
 +
Updated Extent Competed on PRE CLOD Delivery Order Referencing Multiple IDV to ‘Non-Competitive Delivery Order’ or ‘Competitive Delivery Order’ based on the existing Extent Competed and Fair Opportunity combination resolution provided by GSA.
 
</td>
 
</td>
<td align="center">6,247</td>
+
<td align="center">34,675</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td style="width:95px" valign="center">FPDSHD-71076</td>
+
<td style="width:95px" valign="center">Competition Report</td>
<td valign="top">
+
<td>  
The user requested to update transaction number to 0 on all the DOs with IDV ID beginning with DAAB07 or W15P7T, contracting office code 'W15P7T', transaction number is 1 and prepared by in ('PADDS.W15P7T@CS.ARMY.MIL', 'PADDS.W15P7T@KO.ARMY.MIL').
+
Updated Extent Competed on Post CLOD Delivery Order Referencing Multiple IDV to the value from IDV if the extent competed is ‘Non-Competitive Delivery Order’ or ‘Competitive Delivery Order’.  
</td>
 
<td>
 
Data fix was completed to update transaction number to 0 on all the DOs with IDV ID beginning with DAAB07 or W15P7T, contracting office code 'W15P7T', transaction_number is 1 and prepared by in ('PADDS.W15P7T@CS.ARMY.MIL', 'PADDS.W15P7T@KO.ARMY.MIL').
 
 
</td>
 
</td>
<td align="center">21,616</td>
+
<td align="center">315,933</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>

Latest revision as of 22:19, 22 September 2010

Listed below are the data management fixes that was completed on September 17, 2010:

SPRDescriptionAwards/IDVs Fixed
FPDSHD-72449 Removed Local Area Set Aside value on all Awards and IDVs where date signed is prior to 04-AUG-2006 43,749
FPDSHD-72449 Removed Local Area Set Aside value on all 1.3, 1.4 final Awards or IDVs, 1.2 final Awards or IDVs that are updated via GUI services or Web Portal and whose Local Area Set Aside value is ‘BSDF’. 188,707
Competition Report

Updated Reason Not competed to 'Authorized by Statute' on all Awards and IDVs whose extent competed is ‘Not Available for Competition’ and Reason Not competed is ‘8AN’.

43,128
Competition Report

Updated Extent Competed on PRE CLOD Delivery Order Referencing Multiple IDV to ‘Non-Competitive Delivery Order’ or ‘Competitive Delivery Order’ based on the existing Extent Competed and Fair Opportunity combination resolution provided by GSA.

34,675
Competition Report

Updated Extent Competed on Post CLOD Delivery Order Referencing Multiple IDV to the value from IDV if the extent competed is ‘Non-Competitive Delivery Order’ or ‘Competitive Delivery Order’.

315,933